
      
         Everyone is familiar with the symbols that the two credit rating giants—Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group
         and Moody’s Investors Service—use in their ratings. These symbols have been in widespread use since John Moody
         introduced the first bond ratings of railroads back in 1909. For issues or issuers of investment-grade quality, S&P assigns
         the ratings AAA, AA, A, and BBB, while Moody’s uses Aaa, Aa, A, and Baa. (Both agencies introduced rating modifiers
         in the early 1980’s, S&P using plus and minus signs and Moody’s using 1, 2, and 3). For issues or issuers
         of non-investment-grade quality, S&P assigns ratings of BB, B, CCC, CC, C, and D, while Moody’s uses Ba, B, Caa,
         Ca, and C (again with modifiers).
 
      
      
         Default Risk 
What do these symbols stand for? The short answer is—the risk
         that an issuer will default on an obligation. The higher the rating, the less likely the chance of default, which is defined
         simply as an issuer’s not making a payment of principal or interest on time. A triple-A rating means the issuer has
         an "extremely strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal on time," according to S&P’s definition, whereas
         near the other end of the scale, a C rating means a "high risk of default or reliance on third parties to prevent default."
         
         Since even people on Wall Street can misunderstand the meaning of ratings, the agencies like to emphasize that ratings
         are informed opinions of credit risk, not currency risk, prepayment risk, interest rate risk or liquidity risk. Ratings are
         neither guarantees against default nor recommendations to trade certain securities. 
 
      
       Who Benefits From Ratings? 
Ratings have persisted for almost a century
         because they serve a useful purpose. All participants in the capital markets benefit from ratings: 
 Issuers
         with either investment-grade or non-investment grade ratings can broaden their market access and their investor base, they
         can achieve lower-cost funding, and they can increase their financial flexibility. 
 Investors find ratings
         to be reliable guides to default risk, assisting them in investment comparisons and sound portfolio management. 
 Regulators
         like ratings because ratings help promote market efficiency by reducing arbitrage and market volatility based on rumor.
         Ratings help assure the stability of the financial system. 
 Intermediaries such as the investment banks use
         ratings to help them plan, price and place securities. 
 Ratings Advisors, such as GIA, benefit because the
         rating process can be confusing, mysterious and complex for even seasoned issuers. GIA helps issuers understand the process
         and thereby optimize their ratings. Indirectly, GIA is also helping the rating agencies do their work more efficiently, because
         an issuer’s presentations to the agencies will be more organized and more focused on key issues, saving time for the
         agency analysts.
 
| Understanding and Managing the Credit Rating Agencies: A Guide for Fixed Income Issuers   NEW BOOK BY ROGER NYE  How to
         achieve an optimal credit ratingAn insider's view on how the rating agencies think and operateThe rights,
         wrongs and rules of credit ratingsA first-time explanation of the business and inner workings of the credit ratings
         industryBehind and beyond the agencies' public websitesThe role of quantitative and qualitative factors
         in the rating decisionThe assumptions that anchor agency perspectives on banks, corporations and governmentsWhat
         to do and what not to do in the annual due diligence meeting with the agencies The dynamics of decision making
         in the Rating Committee  Issuer rights and leverage in rating agency relationsAn influential guide
         to strategies and tactics for issuersPublished by Euromoney Books March 2014
 |